The jury in Lil Durk’s case appears to be taking a very close look at the exact wording of the charges as deliberations continue.

According to reports attributed to Trap Lore Ross, jurors reportedly sent the judge two notes seeking clarification about specific language related to the stalking conspiracy charge and alleged intent to murder.

The judge reportedly declined to provide additional explanations beyond rereading the definitions already contained in the jury instructions.

That detail could be significant—not necessarily because it points toward a particular verdict, but because it suggests jurors are carefully examining what prosecutors were required to prove.

Are they struggling with key elements of the charges?

Are they simply making sure they understand the legal standard before reaching a decision?

At this stage, it is impossible to know what the questions mean for the final outcome.

For Durk’s defense team, however, every sign that the jury is carefully scrutinizing the prosecution’s case is worth watching.

Now the biggest question remains: what verdict will those deliberations ultimately produce?